Saturday, December 28, 2019

Classical Conditioning and Multiple Choice - 4163 Words

[Q1] Multiple Choice - 1 point 1) A group of ideas, assumptions, and generalizations that interpret and illuminate observations that have been made about human growth is referred to as a ____________ theory. A. behavioral B. psychoanalytical C. humanistic D. developmental Answer: D [Q2] Multiple Choice - 1 point 2) _________theorists try to make sense out of observations and construct a story of the human journey from infancy to adulthood. A. Developmental B. Psychoanalytical C. Behavioral D. Humanistic Answer: A [Q3] Multiple Choice - 1 point 3) Which theory answers the question: Do early experiences of neglect or attachment linger into adulthood? A. humanistic B. behavioral C. sociocultural D. psychoanalytic Answer: D [Q4]†¦show more content†¦A. oral B. phallic C. mouth D. genital Answer: A [Q22] Multiple Choice - 1 point 22) With regard to development, Freud believed that: A. development continues throughout adolescence. B. development continues throughout adulthood. C. personalities are developed in the early years. D. development stops in the teen years but changes anew in the later years. Answer: C [Q23] Multiple Choice - 1 point 23) Freud referred to a person’s sex drive as the: A. libido. B. inferiority complex. C. anal stage. D. latency. Answer: A [Q24] Multiple Choice - 1 point 24) Unconscious drives, mostly sexual and aggressive, are driven by the: A. id. B. ego. C. superego. D. complex needs. Answer: A [Q25] Multiple Choice - 1 point 25) Our morals and values learned from our parents are driven by the: A. id. B. ego. C. superego. D. defense mechanisms. Answer: C [Q26] Multiple Choice - 1 point 26) The ego mediates between the id and superego and may use ___________ to keep things under control. A. libido B. psychosexual stages C. parental control D. defense mechanisms Answer: D [Q27] Multiple Choice - 1 point 27) Transforming energy from the libido to create something acclaimed by others, such as a musical masterpiece, is called: A. sublimation. B. rationalization. C. repression. D. suppression. Answer: A [Q28] Multiple Choice - 1 point 28) Many followers of Freud acknowledged the importance of the unconscious. One ofShow MoreRelatedSymptoms And Types Of Anxiety958 Words   |  4 Pagesexplained through learning theories. Exposure therapy is the therapy of choice when treating spider phobia sufferers (Craske Rowe, 1997). Learning is the essential factor in the aetiology of anxiety, specifically fears and phobias. Brought forward by Watson Rayner (1920) and Pavlov (1927), one learning theory that seeks to explain the origin of an individual’s anxiety is classical conditioning. Continued by Rachman (1977), conditioning is where a neutral stimulus is strongly paired with an unconditionedRead MoreApplying Learning Theory to Life1015 Words   |  5 PagesEffective training begins with managers who are able to create an environment that engages different learning types (multiple Intelligences). While it is important, to remember that none can be applied across the panel to all learners in all situations; nevertheless some interconnections are apparent. Blends of pedagogical and embracing various learning panaches help meet the need of a larger portion of the employees. Fundamentally vital is the well-defined material assembled in right sequencesRead MoreThe Theory Of Classical Conditioning Essa y1084 Words   |  5 Pages Classical Conditioning, simply put, is when a neutral stimulus provokes a certain response, due to the fact that it is often associated with another stimulus that induces the response. There are three stages of Classical Conditioning: Before conditioning, during conditioning, and after conditioning. Before conditioning, the Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) is Renee’s classmate who pushed her. As well, the Unconditioned Response (UCR) is feeling scared and hurt. During and after conditioning, Renee’sRead MoreStrengths And Weaknesses Of Psychology1411 Words   |  6 Pagesportraying as a limiting factor. Alternatively, cognitive psychology has influenced areas of study to produce social learning theory, cognitive NE psychology and social conditioning (Hill, 2001). It is also used to treat depression in therapies such as CBT, which again portrays as a strength of the approach due to it have multiple case studies proving evidence of the treatment providing success with many . Overall, it can be seen that even though it has its weaknesses such as being simplistic, theRead MoreThe Key Assumptions Of The Behaviourist School Of Thought1452 Words   |  6 Pagesstudies can be explained by classical and operant conditioning. Classical conditioning, also referred to as â€Å"Pavlovian Conditioning† came about during his research on dog’s saliva and digestion. He discovered the dogs would salivate on the entrance or on hearing the sound of the attendance feeding them. Lahey et al. (2004) said classical conditioning â€Å"is a form of learning that was based on nothing more than the repeated associate of two stimuli†. Operant conditioning on the other hand, is learningRead MorePhysical And Behavioral Changes Of A Child s Temperament, And Capacities That Are Inherited From One s Parents1602 Words   |  7 Pagesfor violent behavior, a rate three times that of the non-incarcerated participants. In a different manner, nurture working alongs ide nature is the â€Å"environmental influences that shape behavior†. Nurture can influence children’s experiences through multiple means, such as biologically, through the impact of a pregnant mother’s use of drugs on her unborn child, or physically, through nutrition. Furthermore, there are also social influences like the way parents discipline their children and how peer relationshipsRead MoreLearning Into Three Sub Categories1825 Words   |  8 Pagesdivide learning into three sub-categories, known as classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning. In classical conditioning, an individual learns how to link two stimuli in a way that help anticipate an event to which he or she has a reaction. Many psychologists have spent countless hours of research and trial to understand this concept. A noteworthy psychologist, Ivan Pavlov, displayed the concept of classical conditioning in a more feasible way through the salivation ofRead MoreCo nflict And Social Behavior Perspective1718 Words   |  7 Pagesin which learning occurs; classical conditioning theory, operant conditioning theory, and cognitive social learning theory (Hutchinson, 2015). Classical conditioning is often associated with physiologist Ivan Pavlov’s experiment with the salivating dog (Hutchinson, 2015). This experiment focused on conditioning the dog to associate food with the bell while salivating, and eventually salivates when the bell is rung even without the presence of food. Operant conditioning theory is changed behaviorRead MoreOrganizational Effectiveness Essay1264 Words   |  6 Pagesproduct as intended, organizational effectiveness exists within this company because the goal of the organization was met. Organizations measure their effectiveness in various ways. According to Steers (1976), Organizations typically pursue multiple (and often conflicting) goals--and these goals tend to differ from organization to organization according to the nature of the enterprise and its environment (p. 51). Because of the various types of possible goals, organizations measure their effectivenessRead MoreLearning And Development Processes Of A Child2019 Words   |  9 Pagesbehaviourist view works on a mix of operant and classical conditioning, operant conditioning is a process of learning where behaviour is controlled by consequences such as positive and negative reinforcements and positive and negative punishments. Classical conditioning is when ‘the learner simply responds to external stimuli in a deterministic manner’ (Jordan, Carlile, and Stack, 2008). Pavlov, a behaviourist, looked deeply into the idea of classical conditioning and involuntary responses to stimuli. Pavlov

Friday, December 20, 2019

Alcoholism Nature vs Nurture - 2114 Words

Alcoholism: Nature Versus Nurture For years people have argued that alcoholism is a choice and not a learned or inherited disease. These people will normally agree that yes, children are in fact influenced by family, but purely of a social nature, and that this disease is actually caused by poor economic status, poor social upbringings, or merely by imitating the behaviors of those who raised them. However, research has proven that in a great deal of cases there is in fact enormous basis for alcoholism being a genetic or inherited disease. While genetics cannot predict alcoholics very well, research can show that one can be born to be an alcoholic; the action and reaction taken in spite of or because of this gene however determines the†¦show more content†¦Teenagers often â€Å"binge drink† or drink rapidly in high doses due to a lack of availability, this is another factor that leads to this disease. In some family units alcohol becomes not only an ambiguous symbol of their family but also in many cases it becomes the only means of relation between some members of their clan. Becoming the only thing they have to do thither, the only thing they can relate on, their only method of bonding and communication. It is in these cases that it is most prevalent of the crashing together of the social causes and genetic causes of the disease. Families of this caliber most often use alcohol as a method of reward and celebration. Family gatherings center on the consumption of alcohol. This is also a very dangerous method of bonding amongst family members, a lot of families break down at this point, fights are started, grudges are born, and families are torn apart beyond repair. Putting a bunch of alcoholics or even drunks in the same area will most often lead to disaster and heartache. On the flipside of that coin, are the children who grow up in a household where alcohol is completely forbid den and taboo. These children are raised to believe that alcohol is completely wrong and are never exposed to it at all. Once â€Å"set free† into the real world these individuals are exposed to alcohol and will sometimes become heavy drinkers in a rebellious manner due to never being introduced to it orShow MoreRelatedEssay on Alcoholism Nature vs Nurture Argument2784 Words   |  12 PagesAlcoholism and the Nature vs. Nurture Argument Does the environment that one grows up in contribute to alcoholism or is alcoholism determined by genetics? It wasn’t until 1991 that alcoholism was considered both a medical and psychiatric disease by the American Medical Association. Alcoholism is defined in the dictionary as a chronic disorder characterized by dependence on alcohol, repeated excessive use of alcoholic beverages, the development of withdrawal symptoms on reducingRead MoreThe Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Learning More about Alcoholism2588 Words   |  11 PagesThe Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Learning More about Alcoholism INTRODUCTION: Alcoholism can affect anyone. It has enormous costs as it pertains to societies, families, and individuals. It is not prejudicial towards any race, color, sex, religion, or economic level. Although we do have ideas as to what alcoholism is, what we do not know is the exact cause(s) of this problem. Researchers are continually seeking answers to the long-standing nature versus nurture debate. Different viewsRead MoreMany Causes of Alcoholism1290 Words   |  6 PagesThe Many Causes of Alcoholism Every story has two sides to it. Alcoholism is very complicated story in the â€Å"nature vs. nurture† debate. Alcoholism is uncontrollable and everybody has a different perception of what it is. A persons understanding of what alcoholism actually is can determine whether they think alcoholism is nature or nurture. From my own understanding, I think that alcoholism has multiple causes. Many people may think that alcoholics are people who drink often or drink everyday,Read MoreNature Vs. Nurture : Addiction1102 Words   |  5 Pages Nature vs. Nurture: Addiction Introduction Psychology is a developing science which studies the mental functions, processes, and behaviors of an individual. In the science of psychology, many debates arise; nature vs. nurture is one of the most popular ones. These psychological debates are followed by research, backing up either nature or nurture or both. Nature suggest heredity impacts human psychological development; nurture suggests the environment impacts our psychologicalRead MoreNature Through Nurture : Nature And Nurture1207 Words   |  5 PagesEmily Yang Psych 21 Nature Through Nurture For many years we have questioned whether humans are shaped by NATURE or NURTURE. Nature, meaning we are structured by our GENES (internal influences), or nurture, shaped by our environment and experiences (external influences). Recent studies has enabled us to see that both these factors are crucial to development and greatly intertwined. Thus, in recent years it has become â€Å"nature, through nurture†. We are able to see GENETIC influence in developmentRead MoreNature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More? Essay1300 Words   |  6 PagesNature versus nurture has emerged as one of the most heated debates in the 21st century. It is more aligned towards the internal and external factors that comprise human beings behavior. The internal factors are innate and perceived to be genetically revolved as opposed to the external factors that are influenced by the environment and individuals’ experiences. However, scholars in different fields have researched on the relationship between nature and nurture without due success and this has createdRead MoreEssay Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Substance Abuse1125 Words   |  5 PagesThe question of nature vs. nurture has been the focus of many debates, especially within the discipline of psychological sciences. This paper will examine the views that exist regarding the importance of contributions to the risk of addi ction, specifically, genetic (nature) vs. environmental (nurture) contributions through a review of the existing literature. The nature-based view is that expression of addiction (phenotype) is based upon genetic predisposition (genotype). Numerous genetic studiesRead MoreThe Psychoanalytic Approach . And Some Of The Influential987 Words   |  4 Pageseight psychosocial stages of development that are seen throughout one’s life. The eight stages are; trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. doubt, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, identity vs. role confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, and ego integrity vs. despair. Erikson believed that nature determines the order of the stages and sets the parameters that nurture operates within (Sharkey, W. 1997). Erikson’s psychosocial stage theory of personality is still influentialRead More Genetic Factors and Criminal Behavior Essay709 Words   |  3 Pagescountries, with an attempt to see if these factors related to the children’s criminal offenses both early in life and later on. The authors looked at if there is a genetic liability to violence and if there is a genetic link between violence and alcoholism. Other researchers expanded and reanalyzed on the findings of the earlier tests to come at their results. They were trying to see if violent offending might be heritable. One study looked at severe mental illness and it’s possible genetic relationshipRead MoreNature vs. Nurture Shown in Family Addiction3111 Words   |  12 PagesConsider the following scenario: John and his mother are both alcoholics. John has been exposed to his mother’s inappropriate relationship with alcohol since before he was born. In the age-old debate of nature vs. nurture, some would say it was merely natural for John to follow his mother’s path, a la the apple does not fall far from the tree—his addiction was inherited. Others would argue that John’s childhood experiences and home environment led him on the road to addiction. Many might question

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Brown & Anor v The State of Tasmania-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the Constitutional Significance of Brown Anor v State of Tasmania. Answer: This paper seeks to examine the constitutional significance of a case by the name of Brown Anor v The State of Tasmania. This is a case that sought to argue that the Protection from Protesters Act was unconstitutional, and it violated the implied right to freedom of political speech and expression. Moreover, this paper examines the manner in which the Protection from Protesters Act could be used to determine the 1983 case of the Commonwealth of Australia v The State of Tasmania. This was a case that raised a number of constitutional issues, including the validity of the World Heritage Conservation Act[1]. Brown Anor v The State of Tasmania (2017) is an important case that raises weight constitutional issues touching on the freedom of speech on political matters and issues of government. Note that, any democracy in the world; value this element of freedom of speech and association. This is an important element that characterizes a democratic government. Australia is one of the major democracies. However, the Australian constitution does not expressly provide for the freedom of speech on political issues and matters of government. It is based on this fact that the Australian High Court, under the 1992 case of Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth, came up with a decision that freedom of speech on matters of politics and government is implied in the Australian constitution[2]. In this leading case, the challenge was on the constitutional validity of the 1991 Act of Political Broadcasts and Disclosures, and whether this law violated the provisions of the Australian constitution. This law was enacted to regulate the process of advertising during the elections time, and it made it mandatory for media organizations to provide a free broadcast of political activities at designated times. Based on these provisions, the Australian Capital Television was challenging the provisions of this law, and it wanted them to be declared invalid. Upon close examination of this act of parliament, the Australian High court declared it to be invalid. This is because the acted violated the implied right to the freedom of speech that is guaranteed by the constitution. While making this act of parliament to be invalid, the High Court was of the opinion that people have a right to express themselves, if it involves issues touching ion governance, political matters and public issues . These rights are implied by the Australian constitution. In the view of the High Court, freedom of expression and speech is a fundamental requirement of a democratic society, without which, the principles of democracy cannot hold. The Australian constitution promotes the principles of democratic governance, thus, it can be implied that the freedom of speech and expression are part and parcel of the constitution. There have also been a number of subsequent cases that are talking about the constitutionality of the freedom of speech and expression on matters relating to governance and political affairs. These rulings have been used for purposes of determining the scope of implied freedom of speech and expression. On this note, the scope normally extends to: Discussion of political issues and government affairs. Performance of government officials and members of parliament. Discussion of the performance of government officials, their conduct and whether they are fit for service. The constitutionality of the various acts of parliament. On this note, the freedom of speech on political matters and affairs of government only extends to areas where political issues are involved. Basing on these facts, it is important to denote that Brown Anor v The State of Tasmania (2017) HCA raises the constitutional issues of freedom of speech on political governance and affairs[3]. This case challenges the constitutionality of an act of parliament called Protection from Protesters Act that was enacted in 2014. According to the petitioner, the act is invalid and this is basically because it contravenes the implied freedom of speech and expression as outlined in the leading case of Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth. The case aims at challenging whether the act passes the constitutional test. This law places on spot fines to people who are caught violating it, and repeat offenders are given tougher penalties if caught. Brown and Anor argue that the law violates their right to freely express themselves, because it limits their capability to protest against political activities that touches on environmental issues. Note that, while challenging this law, the plaintiffs were arrested in 2016, for protesting against the proposed logging activities at the Lapoinya Forest. This is a forest that is found in Tasmania. While building up their case, Brown Anor uses 3 of the Protection from Protesters Act. Section 3 of the act identifies the powers of the police in relation to preventing protesters from engaging in their right to expression and speech[4]. For instance, the act gives powers to police officers to arrest and prevent any person or group of people from engaging in a political protest. This is in case the protests will hinder or prevent the commencement of a business activity in Tasmania. Moreover, this section provides powers to police officers to be able to direct protesters away from the business premises for a period of up to three months, failure to which, they are likely to face criminal charges. From the provisions of section 3 of the act, it is possible to denote that it raises weighty issues of the constitution, regarding on the role of the police in promoting freedom of speech. Obviously, threatening an individual with arrest or prohibiting them from protesting because of a government policy violates their implied right to freedom of speech and expression, as contained in the case of Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth. Another important constitutional issue that the case raises is on section 7 and 6 of the Protection from Protesters Act. According to the Brown and Anor, the provision of these sections makes this act to be invalid. This is because it gives powers to police officers to punish on-site protests without considering the implications of those punishments on political communication. This is a weighty constitutional issue, since it seeks to examine the role of law enforcement officers in preserving and protecting the constitution. Moreover, Brown and Anor in this case argue that the provisions of the act do not outline any measures that have been put in place, with the aim of protecting the freedom to political communication that is implied in the constitution. Note that, for any law to be valid it should not breach the constitution, thus, the major arguments of Brown and Anor is for the courts to declare the Protection from Protesters Act invalid, since it breaches the provisions of the constitution. Despite these weight constitutional issues that are raised by the plaintiff, the government of Tasmania argue that the act is narrow in scope, and is only limited in business premises and the aim is to prevent the obstructions of a business activity that happens in the area. Based on the arguments that are presented by the government of Tasmania regarding the constitutionality of the Protection from Protesters Act, we are able to use it to make a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the World Heritage Properties Act that was enacted in 1983. Under this act, the Federal Government got authority to prevent the State of Tasmania from building a dam along the River Franklin. The passage of this law was enacted for purposes of protecting World Heritage sites[5]. The High Court of Australia in its ruling observed that the Federal Government did not surpass its authority over heritage sites, but it aimed at protecting the sites from destruction, thus the enactment of the act. On this note, the heritage act was enacted in good faith, and within the authority of the Federal Government. Moreover, by using the Protection from Protesters Act, the most viable ruling in this case of Commonwealth of Australia v The State of Tasmania is upholding the law. This is because the aim of the protesters act is to protect the environment from disruption: that is the main aim of the heritage act. Moreover, the scope of environmental; protection is low, and it is limited to World Heritage Sites. The same is applicable with the introduction of the Protection from Protesters Act, which limits the protection to identified sites, such as business organizations and environmental places. On this basis, the ruling based on the state law, is the upholding of the World Heritage Site. Finally, Brown Anor v The State of Tasmania raises weighty constitutional issues, regarding the freedom of speech. The case law concerns itself whether the Protection from Protesters Act is constitutional, since it breaches the implied freedom of speech on issues regarding political affairs and governance. The case seeks to nullify the act, with the notion that it is unconstitutional. Bibliography Cases Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth (1992) HCA Brown Anor v The State of Tasmania (2017) HCA Comm Legislation Political Broadcasts and Disclosures Act (1992) Protection from Protesters Act (2014) World Heritage Properties Conservation Act (1983) Commonwealth of Australia v The State of Tasmania (1983). Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth (1992) HCA Brown Anor v The State of Tasmania (2017) HCA Protection from Protesters Act 2014 World Heritage Properties Conservation Act (1983)

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Question Of Being Essay Example For Students

Question Of Being Essay annonMany events were unexplainable and maybe even seemed to be magical beforescience evolved to what it is today. All questions relating to the originof life can be answered scientifically. The creation of the universe andall events since can be explained. One may question their beliefs basedon scientific theory. Human life can even be broken down to fundamentaltheory. Not only geological or biological, but all events can be answeredscientifically. One^?s belief in a god or a higher being may help in dealing with the rigorsof life and create a sense of security. All base their lives on some sortof belief. This belief however is different for everyone. The actions of areligious person stem from their belief in a god. A person may act morallyand responsibly in hopes that they will receive good judgement upondeparture from this earth. No one can say for certain if there is a heavenor a hell, but obviously a religious person would rather not go to the laterof the two. This is not to say, that one whom does not believe in a goddoes not act morally or responsibly. An atheist^?s actions do not stem fromthe fear of judgement from god but rather from the judgement of society. Religious and non-religious people alike will most likely base their actionson their conception of the highest ethical good. I consider myself to be sort of an existentialist. This encompasses thescope of individual existence and individual freedom. Life, I believe isbased in its entirety on one goal that is different for everyone. Twothings are ultimately correct, the certainty of death and themeaninglessness of one^?s life. Once a person determines his goal, he mustpursue it with a white-hot passion in order for happiness to be obtained. Camus^? theory of the ^?absurd^? is a belief, which I hold veryhighly. This theory explains that one will spend every moment of his lifechasing the same goal, which he has set for himself, and that life is infact monotonous. In this monotony happiness is reached but can also bequestioned upon the realization of life^?s meaningless pursuit of one goal. At moments in everyone^?s life, they will suddenly become aware of life^?sabsurdity. To one, life may seem meaningless, but looking at the ^?bigpicture^? life is insignificant. While suffering the knowledge that one^?slife is meaningless and entirely monotonous, one must find happiness inlife. This quote from The Myth of Sisyphus by Camus may help to explain howhappiness and the absurd must go hand in hand. ^?Happiness and the absurdare two children of the same earth, they are inseparable.^? If happiness cannot be found in one^?s life then it is not worth living. If one feels they are not subject to the judgement of god, I can only hopethat in their pursuit of happiness they feel the judgement of society. Sadly but truly, there are those among us who feel no moral responsibility. I am uncertain, as is everyone, to what the afterlife will hold. There maybe a heaven and a hell, but there is no concrete evidence supporting this. As is there no evidence supporting the belief that there is no afterlife. Quite a few people wish to live forever and in doing this adopt the idea ofthe afterlife. Camus believed that, ^?Men are never really willing to dieexcept for the sake of freedom: therefore they do not believe in dyingcompletely.^? I believe many people live with the hope that they will diephysically, they will spiritually live forever in the kingdom of heaven. .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 , .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .postImageUrl , .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 , .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:hover , .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:visited , .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:active { border:0!important; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:active , .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20 .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uc42056a9a60a9068541db2a07f591d20:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Pearl Harbor And FDR EssayMany live their lives in anticipation of an afterlife, which after all maynot exist. The goal, which these people have set for themselves, includesspending an eternity in heaven. Some may ask if in fact, these lives werewasted in pursuit of an afterlife, which may only be fictional. I believethat one^?s life is not wasted if he has found happiness. John Paul Sartreonce said, ^?One is still what one is going to cease to be and already whatone is going to become. One lives one^?s death, one dies one^?s life.^? I don^?t think it is very intelligent to live your life in anticipation of yourdeath. I live my life trying to obtain a goal. Day in and day out I chase afterthis same goal. realizing my life is globally meaningless and monotonous, Ifind happiness in the hope that one day my goal will be reached. Personally, I do not believe in the afterlife, but I do not deny that itcould exist. My actions are made with the judgement of society in mind and,therefore, are moral and responsible according to the expectations of modernsociety. I have found happiness in my life and I feel complete. I do notwish to live forever, but rather I accept that one day I must die, bothphysically and spiritually. My life is not based on the prerequisites setforth by any religion, but rather in obtaining my own personal goal. I willbe able to leave this world happily knowing that I struggled for the samegoal endlessly.